Strong-talent trainees' mean learning outcome was higher than weak-talent trainees' mean¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · q3 peer-reviewed experiment
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The mean learning outcome among students with strong teaching talent was 23.9655 higher than among students with weak teaching talent, i.e. 16.4691, a difference of 7.4964 significant at p < .05. → Mutrofin 2017

q3 i2 Teacher trainees with strong teaching talent achieved significantly higher learning outcomes than those with weak teaching talent (partial eta squared = .440). → Mutrofin 2017

Evidence¶

Mutrofin 2017¶

Mutrofin, Degeng, I.N.S., Ardhana, I.W., & Setyosari, P. (2017). The Effect of Instructional Methods (Lecture-Discussion versus Group Discussion) and Teaching Talent on Teacher Trainees Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138824

q3 · i?

Pairwise comparison of estimated marginal means for teaching talent in the same quasi-experiment: strong-talent mean exceeded weak-talent mean by 23.9655 versus 16.4691, a t-test difference of 7.4964 significant at p < .05; no standardized effect size was printed for this pairwise contrast.

"the mean score of learning outcomes among students with stro ng learning talents was 23.9655 higher than that am ong students with weak learning talents, i.e. 16.4691. Based on t test, the difference of scores was 7.496 4, significant at p <.05"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The interaction of instructional method and teaching talent significantly affected teacher trainees' student learning outcomes — related
• Group discussion was more effective than lecture-discussion in improving teacher trainees' student learning outcomes — related