Participants reported that group processing affected their broader university experience and their experiences after university¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Participants agreed that group processing affected the rest of their university experience (mean=8.1) and their experiences after university (mean=7.9), and believed it impacted their EBL experience (mean=8.3) and learning more broadly (mean=8.5). → Lachowsky 2021

Evidence¶

Lachowsky 2021¶

Lachowsky, N. J., & Murray, J. (2021). Group Processing: Students Reflections on the Experience and Impact of Group Processing. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i2.2883

q2 · i? · associational · r1

In the retrospective survey of 46 former seminar students, participants agreed that group processing affected the rest of their university experience (mean=8.1) and their experiences after university (mean=7.9).

"Importantly, there was agreement that group processing affected the rest of their university experience (mean=8.1), and their experiences after university (mean=7.9)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students retrospectively evaluated group processing as time well spent and vividly remembered it years later — related
• Most former students reported using group processing after their seminar and rated it as transferable to other contexts — related
• In one experiment with undergraduate business majors in asynchronous online small groups, reward interdependence raised agreement that group work was beneficial and generated better ideas — related
• Students' evaluation of group processing as a positive contribution to learning increased significantly from the beginning to the end of the course and again to the time of survey — related