Claims

Group scales allow examining fifty or a hundred children in an hour, whereas individual Binet testing restricts use to special cases

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 1919 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The individual Binet scale's time cost restricts its employment to special cases, while a group scale permits examining fifty or a hundred children in an hour, with further labor only in scoring and tabulating. → Bell 1919

Evidence

Bell 1919

Bell, J. C. (1919). Editorial: The National Research Council. The Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume X, No. 9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Educational_Psychology

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The editorial contrasts the Binet scale, whose per-pupil individual examination "restrict[s] its employment to special cases," with a group scale that may examine "fifty or a hundred children" per hour. This is the editor's comparative argument, not a measured trial.

"Schoolmen generally have come to see the advantages of the Binet measurements of intelligence, but the necessity of examining each pupil individually has put such a time cost on the use of the scale as to restrict its employment to special cases. With such a group scale fifty or a hundred children may be examined in an hour, and the only further labor is found in scoring and tabulating the results."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id group-scale-throughput-versus-binet-individual
title Group scales allow examining fifty or a hundred children in an hour, whereas individual Binet testing restricts use to special cases
description Group scales allow examining fifty or a hundred children in an hour, whereas individual Binet testing restricts use to special cases
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1919
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bell-1919

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.