Claims

The reviewer finds the tests-and-scales book's intelligence-measurement chapter useful but its least satisfactory part, criticizing the Stanford-Binet treatment and the omission of the National Tests

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q1
Currency · newest study 1920 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The reviewer judges the chapter on measuring general intelligence a useful innovation but the least satisfactory chapter in the book, criticizing the clumsy treatment of the Stanford-Binet and the omission of the National Tests. → A. I. G 1920

Evidence

A. I. G 1920

A. I. G. (1920). New Publications. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=none-in-text

q1 · i? · review · r?

The reviewer's assessment of the reviewed textbook's intelligence chapter, which instructs teachers in using the Trabue Language Scales, the Otis and the Haggerty tests as measures of intelligence. The reviewer calls the chapter a useful innovation yet finds it "the least satisfactory in the book."

"We are surprised that the National Tests were not included, and the treatment of the Stanford-Binet test is clumsy. It is unfortunate that this chapter is the least satisfactory in the book."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id intelligence-chapter-least-satisfactory
title The reviewer finds the tests-and-scales book's intelligence-measurement chapter useful but its least satisfactory part, criticizing the Stanford-Binet treatment and the omission of the National Tests
description The reviewer finds the tests-and-scales book's intelligence-measurement chapter useful but its least satisfactory part, criticizing the Stanford-Binet treatment and the omission of the National Tests
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1920
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — a-i-g-1920

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.