Claims

Form Six students taught graph functions with Geometer's Sketchpad scored significantly higher on the post-test achievement measure than students taught by chalk and talk

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test achievement in graph functions was significantly higher than the control group's (t(20) = −5.067, p < 0.01). → Eu 2006

Evidence

Eu 2006

Leong Kwan Eu. (2006). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In Graph Functions. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. http://www.mojet.net

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 22 experimental and 21 control students in intact classes over ten weeks; experimental post-test mean 65.90 (SD 23.54) versus control 29.14 (SD 18.41), and the post-test difference was "significant at p < 0.01". No effect size is printed.

"Meanwhile the t-test between the scores of the post-tests of the control and experimental group showed a value of t(20) = −5.067. Hypothesis testing shows that the value is significant at p < 0.01."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.