Claims

Students taught graph functions with Geometer's Sketchpad showed significantly more positive attitude at post-test than the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The post-test attitude difference between the experimental and control groups was significant (t(20)=0.33, p < 0.01). → Eu 2006

Evidence

Eu 2006

Leong Kwan Eu. (2006). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In Graph Functions. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. http://www.mojet.net

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Ten-item four-point Likert attitude test administered to both groups before and after the ten-week treatment; experimental post-test mean 2.61 (SD 0.24) versus control 2.55 (SD 0.43), reported as "significant with t(20)=0.33 as p < 0.01". No effect size is printed.

"the differences between the post-test of the experimental group and the control group as significant with t(20)=0.33 as p < 0.01."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.