Habit shows the strongest direct and competence-mediated associations with teachers' AI use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Habit was significantly associated with pedagogical AI competence (β = 0.31, p < .001) and with AI use directly (β = 0.28, p = .005) and indirectly via competence (β = 0.14, p = .011). → Feng 2026
Evidence¶
Feng 2026¶
Feng, S., Koch, M. J., & Carolus, A. (2026). AI Mindset – An empirically tested theoretical framework on the psychological factors shaping AI competence and AI use. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100402
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Structural equation model results for the same teacher sample (n = 205 analysed). The direct-effect sentence reports "habit (β = 0.28, p = .005)" as a significant direct association with AI use; the competence path (β = 0.31, p < .001) and indirect effect (β = 0.14, p = .011) come from the same results section.
"In addition, significant direct associations with AI use were observed for technology-related appraisals and contextual and social factors: habit (β = 0.28, p = .005), hedonic motivation (β = 0.19, p = .029), and AI-related fear (β = 0.15, p = .008)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Effort expectancy is associated with AI use only indirectly through competence, whereas hedonic motivation shows a direct positive association — related
- Openness and need for relatedness are associated with teachers' AI use indirectly through pedagogical AI competence, with relatedness negatively associated with competence — related
- AI-related fear shows a differentiated pattern: positive direct association with AI use but negative association with pedagogical AI competence and negative indirect effect — related
- Pedagogical AI competence is positively associated with teachers' AI use — related
- Hedonic motivation and habit were the strongest predictors of behavioral intention, and habit also substantially predicted use behavior — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
habit-strongest-association-teacher-ai-use |
title |
Habit shows the strongest direct and competence-mediated associations with teachers' AI use |
description |
Habit shows the strongest direct and competence-mediated associations with teachers' AI use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — feng-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.