AI-related fear shows a differentiated pattern: positive direct association with AI use but negative association with pedagogical AI competence and negative indirect effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Fear was positively associated with AI use directly (β = 0.15, p = .008) but negatively associated with pedagogical AI competence (β = -0.15, p = .025), yielding a negative indirect effect (β = -0.07, p = .044). → Feng 2026
q2 i? The competence-side fear path was negative, as printed in the parameter table. → Feng 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Feng 2026¶
Feng, S., Koch, M. J., & Carolus, A. (2026). AI Mindset – An empirically tested theoretical framework on the psychological factors shaping AI competence and AI use. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100402
q2 · i? · associational · r?
SEM direct-effect results for the teacher sample. The results sentence reports "AI-related fear (β = 0.15, p = .008)" as a significant positive direct association with AI use; the indirect effect (β = -0.07, p = .044) is reported in the same results section.
"In addition, significant direct associations with AI use were observed for technology-related appraisals and contextual and social factors: habit (β = 0.28, p = .005), hedonic motivation (β = 0.19, p = .029), and AI-related fear (β = 0.15, p = .008)."
Feng 2026 (2)¶
Feng, S., Koch, M. J., & Carolus, A. (2026). AI Mindset – An empirically tested theoretical framework on the psychological factors shaping AI competence and AI use. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100402
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Parameter estimates table (Table 1) of the SEM. The row for fear to pedagogical AI competence prints a negative standardised coefficient (β = -0.15, 95% CI excluding zero, p = .025), supporting the negative competence association.
"Fear → AI competence ¡0.15 ¡0.28; ¡0.02 0.025*"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Openness and need for relatedness are associated with teachers' AI use indirectly through pedagogical AI competence, with relatedness negatively associated with competence — related
- Perceived risk of using ChatGPT is negatively associated with both use frequency and intention to use among undergraduates — related
- Effort expectancy is associated with AI use only indirectly through competence, whereas hedonic motivation shows a direct positive association — related
- Habit shows the strongest direct and competence-mediated associations with teachers' AI use — related
- Pedagogical AI competence is positively associated with teachers' AI use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-fear-differentiated-direct-indirect-pattern |
title |
AI-related fear shows a differentiated pattern: positive direct association with AI use but negative association with pedagogical AI competence and negative indirect effect |
description |
AI-related fear shows a differentiated pattern: positive direct association with AI use but negative association with pedagogical AI competence and negative indirect effect |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — feng-2026, feng-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.