Claims

Hackathon teams face 16 general challenges across seven types that hamper teamwork

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analyses of a hackathon CSCL setting revealed sixteen general challenges and seven types of challenges that hamper teamwork. → Sanna Järvelä 2022

Evidence

Sanna Järvelä 2022

Sanna Järvelä, Carolyn P. Rosé. (2022). Relations Matter – CSCL Research Informing and Developing CL Competencies. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2022) 17:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09373-x

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative theory-driven coding of questionnaire (AIRE), interview and team-interaction video data collected during a two-day international Physics hackathon among undergraduate and graduate students; the editorial reports the coding "revealed 16 general challenges and seven types of challenges".

"Their analyses revealed 16 general challenges and seven types of challenges that hamper teamwork in a hackathon."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hackathon-teamwork-challenges-sixteen-general-seven-types
title Hackathon teams face 16 general challenges across seven types that hamper teamwork
description Hackathon teams face 16 general challenges across seven types that hamper teamwork
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sanna-järvelä-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.