Claims

Professionals self-report competence with clozapine guidelines but express less confidence in adhering to them

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across included studies, HCPs self-reported as competent with local and national guidelines yet expressed less confidence in their ability to adhere to them and were uncertain about managing side effects. → Secchi Agostina 2025

Evidence

Secchi Agostina 2025

Secchi Agostina, Whiskey Eromona, Nair Sajitha, Shergill Sukhi, Thomas Trudy. (2025). Competence and confidence of health care professionals in using clozapine: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2025.10024

q2 · i? · review · r3

Qualitative thematic synthesis of 34 studies of health care professionals managing clozapine. The review reports that professionals "self-reported as competent with guidelines" while expressing less confidence in adherence and side-effect management. The review cautions self-report may overestimate competence.

"HCPs self-reported as competent with guidelines (local and national), yet they expressed less confidence in their ability to adhere to them and were uncertain about managing side effects."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.