Claims

Associations between psychosocial factors and academic performance are heterogeneous, with 13 of 45 studies reporting null or weak findings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the 45 included studies, 32 reported at least one statistically significant association and 13 reported non-significant or weak associations, more common in smaller samples, self-reported outcomes, brief screening tools, or institutional disruption periods. → Ríos Andrade Raúl 2026

Evidence

Ríos Andrade Raúl 2026

Ríos Andrade Raúl, Peralta Ramírez Aziel Alejandro, Trujillo López Sergio. (2026). Psychosocial factors associated with academic performance in medical students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08742-6

q2 · i? · review · r3

Overall synthesis count across the review's 45 included observational studies. The review reports "32 reported at least one statistically significant association" while 13 reported non-significant or weak associations, attributing nulls to heterogeneity in measures, populations, and outcomes, or true null effects.

"Across the 45 studies, 32 reported at least one statistically significant association between psychosocial factors and academic performance, while 13 studies reported non-significant or weak associations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.