Claims

Heuristic-methodological instruction increases pupils' singling out of main concepts and ideas from a text

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Control-group pupils significantly more often left the answer space blank when asked to single out main concepts and ideas from the text (χ2(3)=10.111, p=0.018). → Veselinov and Nikolic 2015

Evidence

Veselinov and Nikolic 2015

Danica Veselinov, Radmila Nikolić. (2015). THE POSSIBILITIES OF ENCOURAGING STUDENT'S METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES THROUGH HEURISTIC-METHODOLOGICAL INSTRUCTION. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.06

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Chi-square analysis of the concepts-and-ideas task in the six-month quasi-experiment. "The control group pupils in a significantly higher number left the answer space blank for this question." Experimental pupils invented names and drawings for concepts. No effect size printed.

"In the category in which the pupils needed to single out the main ideas and concepts from the text, the Chi-square test showed a statistically si gnificant difference between the experimental and control group answers (χ2(3)=10.11 1, on the level 0.05 р=0.018)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.