Comprehension gains appeared on main-idea and inference items but not on word-meaning-guessing items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Both groups made significant progress on items asking students to determine the main idea and draw inferences (questions 1, 3, 5), except question 2 asking students to guess word meanings. → Bogale 2018
Evidence¶
Bogale 2018¶
Bogale, Y. N. (2018). Conceptualizing Reading to Learn: Strategy Instruction and EFL Students' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 10(2), 93–117. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207221
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Item-level paired analysis of the researcher-developed pre/post tests. The article reports progress on main-idea and inference items but notes students "could not do so even after the instruc tion" on the word-meaning item, citing Wong (2010) on similar difficulty.
"It was found that both groups of students made significant progress on each item, especially on questions number 1, 3, 5 e xcept question number 2. Question number 1 asks students to determine the main idea o f the text, whereas questions number 3 and 5 ask the students to draw inferences and question 2 asks students to guess meaning of words in the reading text."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Inferencing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- In a cluster randomized trial, CIRC produced a statistically significant positive effect on main idea identification (effect size 0.85) but not on inference questions — related
- Gender shows no significant difference in inferring word meanings between experimental and control groups — related
- The cooperative learning component's added benefit over direct instruction alone with CIRC materials was not statistically significant on main idea identification — related
- Retrieval practice enhances performance on final inference and transfer questions relative to restudying, although a single-word fill-in-the-blank task did not — related
- Heuristic-methodological instruction increases pupils' singling out of main concepts and ideas from a text — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.