Claims

HICRT effects on belief assessment show a dose-response pattern with number of fitness sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Belief assessment showed a 0.73 effect size gain with 48 sessions of HICRT versus a 0.40 gain with 28 sessions of HICRT. → Zwilling 2019

Evidence

Zwilling 2019

Zwilling, C. E., Daugherty, A. M., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J. & Barbey, A. K. (2019). Enhanced decision-making through multimodal training. npj Science of Learning 4:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0049-x

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

The authors' interpretation, in the Discussion, comparing the printed effect sizes (0.73 for 48 HICRT sessions, 0.40 for 28 HICRT sessions) across intervention arms; the comparison is observational across conditions rather than a manipulated dose test.

"belief assessment demonstrates a 0.73 effect size gain for the fitness intervention with 48 sessions of HICRT and a 0.40 effect size gain for the fitness plus cognitive training intervention with 28 sessions of HICRT."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.