Claims

High- and low-prior-knowledge learners differ significantly on an algebra posttest and on intrinsic and germane cognitive load, but not on extraneous load

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Prior knowledge (high vs low) had significant main effects on the posttest (F1, 107 = 121.64, p < .001, ŋ2 = .53), intrinsic load (ŋ2 = .17) and germane load (ŋ2 = .15). → Gupta 2020 q3 i? No significant difference was found between high- and low-prior-knowledge learners on extraneous cognitive load (F = .018, p = .895). → Gupta 2020 (2)

Evidence

Gupta 2020

Gupta, U., & Zheng, R. Z. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

In a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial experiment with college students solving simultaneous equations, with prior knowledge groups formed by a tri-split of pretest scores, the analysis reported "significant main effects for high - and low-prior knowledge learners by posttest (F1, 107 = 121.64, p < .001, ŋ2 = .53)", plus intrinsic (ŋ2 = .17) and germane load (ŋ2 = .15).

"The follow-up analysis revealed significant main effects for high - and low-prior knowledge learners by posttest (F1, 107 = 121.64, p < .001, ŋ2 = .53), intrinsic cognitive load (F1, 107 = 21.40, p < .001, ŋ2 = .17), and germane cognitive load (F1, 107 = 18.12, p < .001, ŋ2 = .15)."

Gupta 2020 (2)

Gupta, U., & Zheng, R. Z. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same experiment, prior-knowledge contrast on the CLM extraneous subscale: "no significance was found between high- and low-prior knowledge learners for extraneous cognitive load (F = .018, p = .895)"; equivalence was not tested.

"but no significance was found between high- and low-prior knowledge learners for extraneous cognitive load (F = .018, p = .895)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id high-and-low-prior-knowledge-learners-differ-in-posttest-intrinsic-and-germane-load
title High- and low-prior-knowledge learners differ significantly on an algebra posttest and on intrinsic and germane cognitive load, but not on extraneous load
description High- and low-prior-knowledge learners differ significantly on an algebra posttest and on intrinsic and germane cognitive load, but not on extraneous load
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — gupta-2020, gupta-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.