Claims

Prior knowledge and worked-example type (full vs completion) interact significantly on self-reported germane cognitive load, but not on intrinsic or extraneous load

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A significant prior knowledge by worked-example interaction was found on germane cognitive load (F1, 107 = 4.72, p < .05, ŋ2 = .04). → Gupta 2020 q3 i? No significant prior knowledge by worked-example differences were observed on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. → Gupta 2020 (2)

Evidence

Gupta 2020

Gupta, U., & Zheng, R. Z. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252

q3 · i? · only an eta squared (.04, not labelled as partial) for the interaction is printed; no standardised mean difference · causal · r2

In a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design with college students solving simultaneous equations (worked-example type and task difficulty randomly assigned; prior knowledge measured and categorised, not manipulated), with cognitive load measured by Leppink et al.'s self-report CLM, "a significant interaction by germane cognitive load (F1, 107 = 4.72, p < .05, ŋ2 = .04) was found between prior knowledge and worked example".

"However, a significant interaction by germane cognitive load (F1, 107 = 4.72, p < .05, ŋ2 = .04) was found between prior knowledge and worked example, suggesting germane cognitive load may serve as a valid indicator for the cognitive process of high - and low-prior knowledge learners when studying with worked examples."

Gupta 2020 (2)

Gupta, U., & Zheng, R. Z. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same experiment and CLM measure: "No significant differences were observed between prior knowledge and worked example as measured by intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load". No statistics are printed for these null tests.

"No significant differences were observed between prior knowledge and worked example as measured by intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id prior-knowledge-by-worked-example-type-interaction-on-germane-load
title Prior knowledge and worked-example type (full vs completion) interact significantly on self-reported germane cognitive load, but not on intrinsic or extraneous load
description Prior knowledge and worked-example type (full vs completion) interact significantly on self-reported germane cognitive load, but not on intrinsic or extraneous load
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — gupta-2020, gupta-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.