Consistently high task complexity yields faster immediate problem-solving than gradually increasing complexity, with no post-test difference¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Consistently high task complexity produced a small significant effect on solution time in Round 2 (η2 = 0.05). → Ines Zeitlhofer 2024
q3 i0 The groups did not differ significantly on post-test time or number of moves (η2 = 0.00). → Ines Zeitlhofer 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Ines Zeitlhofer 2024¶
Ines Zeitlhofer, Joerg Zumbach, Judith Schweppe. (2024). Complexity affects performance, cognitive load, and awareness. Learning and Instruction 94 (2024) 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102001
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
In the between-subjects experiment (N = 98, Tower of Hanoi task), univariate analysis of Round 2 performance showed a small effect of consistently high complexity on time, with the printed effect size η2 = 0.05 (F (1,84) = 4.27, p < .04); the effect on number of moves was not significant.
"Regarding performance, univariate results indicated a small effect of consistently high task complexity on time in Round 2 (F (1,84) = 4.27, p < .04, η2 = 0.05)."
Ines Zeitlhofer 2024 (2)¶
Ines Zeitlhofer, Joerg Zumbach, Judith Schweppe. (2024). Complexity affects performance, cognitive load, and awareness. Learning and Instruction 94 (2024) 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102001
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
In the delayed post-test two days later, both groups solved the six-disk task once; "there were no significant differences between the groups" on moves or time, with printed η2 = 0.00 for both, so equivalence was not tested.
"With respect to the post-test, there were no significant differences between the groups for either the number of moves (F (1,84) = 0.05, p = .82, η2 = 0.00) or time (F (1,84) = 0.01, p < .91, η2 = 0.00)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Task complexity strongly affects germane cognitive load in Round 1, with effects dissipating by post-test — related
- Example-based sequences outperform problem-only practice for novices, and fading support is argued to aid transfer — a broader claim this one bears on
- The teacher-conference problem met the sweet spot of complexity: 10th graders generated solution ideas containing the targeted errors without solving the problem canonically — related
- Metacognition correlates with meta-awareness in the gradually increasing complexity group in Round 2, but not in the consistently high complexity group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
high-complexity-faster-immediate-performance |
title |
Consistently high task complexity yields faster immediate problem-solving than gradually increasing complexity, with no post-test difference |
description |
Consistently high task complexity yields faster immediate problem-solving than gradually increasing complexity, with no post-test difference |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ines-zeitlhofer-2024, ines-zeitlhofer-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.