Claims

High joint on-task engagement with high equality and mutuality of engagement did not necessarily mean cognitive engagement or ensure conceptual change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1997 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 4 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In dyads with high joint on-task engagement high in equality and mutuality, one student achieved substantial conceptual change while the other showed none, indicating such engagement did not guarantee change. → Tao 1997

Evidence

Tao 1997

Tao, Ping-Kee; Gunstone, Richard F. (1997). Conceptual Change in Science through Collaborative Learning at the Computer. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (70th, Oak Brook, IL, March 21-24, 1997). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED406151

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Case-study analysis of the Sam/Mick and Nigel/Stan dyads, whose conversational interactions showed conceptual change during the FMM lessons but where Mick and Stan reverted to alternative conceptions after instruction. The dyads' engagement was high in equality and mutuality, yet only one member of each sustained change.

"In two of the dyads with high joint on-task engagement (Sam/Mick and Nigel/Stan), one student achieved substantial change but the other student showed no change."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id high-equality-mutuality-not-sufficient-conceptual-change
title High joint on-task engagement with high equality and mutuality of engagement did not necessarily mean cognitive engagement or ensure conceptual change
description High joint on-task engagement with high equality and mutuality of engagement did not necessarily mean cognitive engagement or ensure conceptual change
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1997
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tao-1997

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.