High-quality revisers corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time, proofread at the end, and went beyond the suggestions provided in the peer feedback¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? High-quality revisers corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time, proofread in the end, and in doing so went beyond the suggestions provided in the PF. → Van Meenen 2023
Evidence¶
Van Meenen 2023¶
Van Meenen, F., Masson, N., Catrysse, L., & Coertjens, L. (2023). Taking a closer look at how higher education students process and use (discrepant) peer feedback. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101711
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Eye-tracking study of 59 students revising after peer feedback; the article reports high-quality revisers "corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time and proofread in the end, in which they went beyond the suggestions provided in the PF"; no effect size is printed.
"corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time and proofread in the end, in which they went beyond the suggestions provided in the PF."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students producing high-quality revisions spent more time addressing higher order comments — related
- Qualitatively, AI-peer integrated feedback was associated with a broader repertoire of revision operations and more agentive cognitive strategies than peer feedback alone — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
high-quality-revisers-incremental-correction-and-proofreading |
title |
High-quality revisers corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time, proofread at the end, and went beyond the suggestions provided in the peer feedback |
description |
High-quality revisers corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time, proofread at the end, and went beyond the suggestions provided in the peer feedback |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — van-meenen-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.