Students producing high-quality revisions spent more time addressing higher order comments¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Participants with a high-quality revision spent more time addressing higher order comments. → Van Meenen 2023

Evidence¶

Van Meenen 2023¶

Van Meenen, F., Masson, N., Catrysse, L., & Coertjens, L. (2023). Taking a closer look at how higher education students process and use (discrepant) peer feedback. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101711

q3 · i? · causal · r1

In the eye-tracking study of 59 students, the article reports that "Participants with a high-quality revision spent more time addressing higher order comments"; no effect size is printed.

"Participants with a high-quality revision spent more time addressing higher order comments, corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time and proofread in the end"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High-quality revisers corrected one or two lower order aspects at a time, proofread at the end, and went beyond the suggestions provided in the peer feedback — related
• Business Writing students valued AI feedback for higher-order and sentence-level comments but found it sometimes too general, while appreciating peers' contextual knowledge — related