Claims

Students with high reading habit have better reading comprehension than students with low reading habit

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across both classes, students classified as high reading habit scored significantly higher on reading comprehension than students classified as low reading habit. → Rosyida 2018

Evidence

Rosyida 2018

Rosyida, F., & Ghufron, M. A. (2018). Herringbone and Tri Focus Steve Snyder Technique: The Techniques for Teaching Reading Comprehension Viewed from Students' Reading Habit. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11341a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Two-way ANOVA on post-test scores of 51 ninth-graders whose reading habit was measured by a 34-item questionnaire and split at the median into high and low groups. The between-rows (reading habit) effect was significant as printed.

"The significant difference can be seen from Fobs=43.3862 which was higher than Fα=4.0471. It means that the students having high reading habit have better reading comprehension than those having low reading habit."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.