Claims

Students' motivation to learn English reading increased significantly during Herringbone technique implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors report that during HT implementation students were active in filling the Herringbone diagram and their motivation to learn English, especially in reading, increased significantly. → Rosyida 2018

Evidence

Rosyida 2018

Rosyida, F., & Ghufron, M. A. (2018). Herringbone and Tri Focus Steve Snyder Technique: The Techniques for Teaching Reading Comprehension Viewed from Students' Reading Habit. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11341a

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' observational interpretation from the experimental class, attributed in the article to Arriyani & Aryanti's observation that students were active and could fill the Herringbone diagram easily; no statistic or instrument for motivation is printed.

"Besides, it was also found that their motivation to learn English especially in reading increased significantly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.