Claims

Student satisfaction with CBL, PBL and TBL in public health education was high, reported in 21 of 22 studies (95.4%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? 21 of 22 included studies (95.4%) reported positive satisfaction outcomes, and improvements in critical thinking/problem-solving were reported in 14 studies (63.6%) and communication skills in 12 (54.5%). → Mansoor Javeria 2026

Evidence

Mansoor Javeria 2026

Mansoor Javeria, Abdul Hameed Ameerali, Zaidi Tahani Waqar, Naeem Farhat Ul Ain, Mansoor Faareah, Bilal Muhammad, Kadir M Masood. (2026). Use of case-based, problem-based and team-based learning in public health education – a scoping review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108317

q3 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis of the 22 included studies in the review's Results section; outcomes were tallied as frequencies and percentages in table 2, with "21 of 22 studies (95.4%) reporting positive satisfaction outcomes".

"Across studies, student satisfaction was high, with 21 of 22 studies (95.4%) reporting positive satisfaction outcomes. Improvements were noted in critical thinking and problem-solving (14 studies; 63.6%) and communication skills (12 studies; 54.5%; table 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.