Claims

The proportion of experimental-group students at a high tolerance level increased by 165% during the formative experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental group the number of students at a high tolerance level increased by 165%, driven by students moving from the average to the high level, while the control group's average level remained almost unchanged. → Nagovitsyn et al. 2018

Evidence

Nagovitsyn et al. 2018

Roman S. Nagovitsyn, Dana K. Bartosh, Aleksandr Y. Ratsimor, Yuri G. Maksimov. (2018). Formation of Social Tolerance Among Future Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Level-distribution analysis of Intol test results (Table 2) in the 72-student quasi-experiment; the article reports the EG high-level count "increased by 165 %" and attributes the shift to students moving from average to high level.

"At the expiration of the time during which the experiment lasted in the CG, the average level remained almost unchanged, while in the EG the number of students at a high level increased by 165 %."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.