The proportion of experimental-group students at a high tolerance level increased by 165% during the formative experiment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the experimental group the number of students at a high tolerance level increased by 165%, driven by students moving from the average to the high level, while the control group's average level remained almost unchanged. → Nagovitsyn et al. 2018
Evidence¶
Nagovitsyn et al. 2018¶
Roman S. Nagovitsyn, Dana K. Bartosh, Aleksandr Y. Ratsimor, Yuri G. Maksimov. (2018). Formation of Social Tolerance Among Future Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Level-distribution analysis of Intol test results (Table 2) in the 72-student quasi-experiment; the article reports the EG high-level count "increased by 165 %" and attributes the shift to students moving from average to high level.
"At the expiration of the time during which the experiment lasted in the CG, the average level remained almost unchanged, while in the EG the number of students at a high level increased by 165 %."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.