Claims

Exercise eliminated the offline skill decline seen after rest: the rest group lost skill over the 6-hour delay while the exercise group did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A significant Group × Time interaction on skill showed the rest group declined between learning and retention while the exercise group showed no change, with no between-group difference at either time point. → Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Evidence

Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Eleanor M. Taylor, Claire J. Cadwallader, Dylan Curtin, Trevor T.-J. Chong, Joshua J. Hendrikse & James P. Coxon. (2024). High-intensity acute exercise impacts motor learning in healthy older adults. npj Science of Learning 9:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00220-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Retention analysis in the same randomised between-groups study, tested ~6 hours after acquisition. The article reports the Group × Time interaction "(F(1, 21) = 5.98, p = 0.03)"; skill scores did not differ significantly between groups at end of acquisition or start of retention. No effect size printed.

"there was a Group by Time interaction (F(1, 21) = 5.98, p = 0.03), with participants in the rest group showing a reduction in skill between learning and retention"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.