Claims

Skill retention after neuraxial technical training tends to decline over time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Skill retention after technical training tends to decline over time, with variation across studies. → Nielsen Martine Siw 2025

Evidence

Nielsen Martine Siw 2025

Nielsen Martine Siw, Ilkjær Frederik Veitland, Grejs Anders Morten, Nielsen Anders Bo, Konge Lars, Brøchner Anne Craveiro. (2025). Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial space access: a scoping review of educational approaches to lumbar puncture, epidural anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.06.008

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's discussion summary table concludes that "Skill retention after technical training tends to decline over time", with just-in-time training showing potential to counteract this loss.

"Skill retention after technical training tends to decline over time, but just-in-time training shows potential in preventing this loss by refreshing skills just before they are needed in practise."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.