Claims

HOCS clicker questions during learning improve performance on LOCS exam questions more than LOCS clicker questions do

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across two semesters, units taught with HOCS clicker questions produced better LOCS exam performance than units taught with LOCS clicker questions (d = 0.47). → Deborah K. Anderson 2023

Evidence

Deborah K. Anderson 2023

Deborah K. Anderson, Michelle Schoenleber, and Stuart Korshavn. (2023). Higher-Order Clicker Questions Engage Students and Prepare Them for Higher-Order Thinking Activities. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00151-22

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Counterbalanced quasi-experiment over two semesters of a nonmajors Human Biology course; paired-sample t tests across both semesters compared the four unit-level exam scores. The study found "HOCS clicker questions contributed to better performance on LOCS exam questions than did LOCS clicker questions" with a small-to-medium effect size (d = 0.47).

"HOCS clicker questions contributed to better performance on LOCS exam questions than did LOCS clicker questions (M LCL = 72% versus MHCL = 76%; t [52] = 4.25, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.47)"

Studies bearing on this claim

Which questions to discuss: recall-level or higher-order? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 4 narrower claims that bear on it: 2 distinct studies (1 causal, 1 associational), q2–q3, 1 of 2 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Deborah K. Anderson 2023 q3 · causal · r2 i2; i? this claim; Students perform better overall on LOCS exam questions than on HOCS exam questions (qualifies); Semester 2 students outperformed semester 1 students on HOCS exam questions regardless of (qualifies); Students perceive LOCS and HOCS clicker questions as equally helpful, despite exam perform (qualifies)
Moore 2011 q2 · associational · r1 i? In physics-based courses for non-science majors taught with active-engagement pedagogy, no (qualifies)

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hocs-clickers-improve-locs-exam-performance
title HOCS clicker questions during learning improve performance on LOCS exam questions more than LOCS clicker questions do
description HOCS clicker questions during learning improve performance on LOCS exam questions more than LOCS clicker questions do
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — deborah-k-anderson-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.