The commentary offers a practice-based perspective on Hilton's (2016) OER efficacy review in the context of the COVID-19 pivot to remote instruction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The commentary interprets Hilton's (2016) review of OER efficacy and perceptions research through the lens of practice during the 2020 COVID-19 pivot to remote instruction. → Hodges 2021
Evidence¶
Hodges 2021¶
Hodges, C. B. (2021). Shift to digital perspectives on Hilton (2016) from the perspective of practice. Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09838-6
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
The commentary's abstract states its purpose: offering "perspectives from a lens of practice" on Hilton's (2016) OER review. No data are reported; the support is the author's stated argument.
"This paper offers the authors perspectives from a lens of practice on the paper, Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions, by John Hilton III published in Educational Technology Research and Development volume 64, pages 573–590 in 2016."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Across 2002-2018, OER efficacy research consistently shows that OER does not harm student learning, with a small positive impact. — related
- OER efficacy research methodology improved between 2015 and 2018, with more studies controlling for student and teacher variables. — related
- Common weaknesses in OER efficacy studies include reliance on non-standard learning measures and challenges with randomization. — related
- The number of published OER efficacy and perceptions studies rose rapidly between 2015 and 2018, with more studies published in those 3 years than in the previous 15. — related
- Students achieve the same or better learning outcomes when using OER compared to commercial textbooks, while saving significant amounts of money. — related
- The majority of faculty and students who have used OER had a positive experience and would do so again. — related
- Future OER research should examine disaggregated data for specific student populations, conduct quantitative meta-analyses, and compare specific OER materials and subject areas. — related
- In direct comparisons of OER and commercial textbooks, a strong majority of participants report OER are as good or better. — related
- OER effectiveness in online courses is attributed to their technological affordances — related
- The commentary calls for future research to examine what student-centered learning in online environments looks like in different contexts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hodges-2021-practice-perspective-hilton-oer |
title |
The commentary offers a practice-based perspective on Hilton's (2016) OER efficacy review in the context of the COVID-19 pivot to remote instruction |
description |
The commentary offers a practice-based perspective on Hilton's (2016) OER efficacy review in the context of the COVID-19 pivot to remote instruction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hodges-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.