In 30 home care visits implementing the Mobility Agreement, the most common cycle combination was client-expansive and worker-expansive (40%), yet at least one party was predominantly defensive in 60% of cases¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The combination of client's expansive cycle and worker's expansive cycle (++) comprised 40% of 30 home care visits, while the both-defensive combination (--) comprised 23%. → Nummijoki 2018
q2 i? In 60% of the 30 cases at least one party was engaged in a predominantly defensive learning cycle. → Nummijoki 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Nummijoki 2018¶
Nummijoki, J., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2018). Defensive and expansive cycles of learning: A study of home care encounters. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 224-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1412970
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Coding analysis of 30 videotaped home care visits over three years, classifying each client's and worker's cycle as predominantly expansive or defensive. The authors report that the ++ combination "was the most common type of combination, comprising 40 % of the cases."
"the combination of client's expansive cycle and worker's expansive cycle (++) was the most common type of combination, comprising 40 % of the cases"
Nummijoki 2018 (2)¶
Nummijoki, J., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2018). Defensive and expansive cycles of learning: A study of home care encounters. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 224-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1412970
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Same coding analysis of 30 visits. The authors note that although the new practice had momentum, "in 60 % of the cases at least one of the parties was engaged in a predominantly defensive cycle."
"in 60 % of the cases at least one of the parties was engaged in a predominantly defensive cycle"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In encounters where both parties are predominantly expansive, early cycle actions such as questioning and modeling are typically absent and the focus is on implementing and consolidating
- In encounters where both client and worker are predominantly defensive, the learning cycle stalls before implementing, reflecting and consolidating actions — related
- Clients shifted between defensive and expansive stances nearly twice as often as workers, and initiatives connected to physical actions were more effective than verbal hints at triggering shifts — related
- Encounters with a mismatch between client's and worker's learning cycles typically contained all or almost all learning actions of the ideal-typical expansive cycle — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
home-care-cycle-combination-distribution |
title |
In 30 home care visits implementing the Mobility Agreement, the most common cycle combination was client-expansive and worker-expansive (40%), yet at least one party was predominantly defensive in 60% of cases |
description |
In 30 home care visits implementing the Mobility Agreement, the most common cycle combination was client-expansive and worker-expansive (40%), yet at least one party was predominantly defensive in 60% of cases |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — nummijoki-2018, nummijoki-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.