Parent-reported home math activities showed no significant association with children's math achievement, and inhibitory control did not moderate this null relation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The interaction between home math activities and inhibitory control was not significant, adding only 0.4% of variance (ΔF(1,113) = 0.63, p = .430). → Silver 2022
q2 i? Home math activities were not significantly related to children's math achievement in the base model, despite a marginally significant bivariate correlation (r = .17). → Silver 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Silver 2022¶
Silver, A. M., Elliott, L., & Libertus, M. E. (2022). Parental math input is not uniformly beneficial for young children: The moderating role of inhibitory control. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000679
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Regression with 123 children testing home math activities × inhibitory control showed the "interaction term was not statistically significant"; planned robustness checks were skipped because significance was not reached. The non-significant interaction is plotted in Figure 3.
"This interaction term was not statistically significant, however, and resulted in only an additional 0.4% of variance explained in children's math achievement, which was not a significant increase from the base model, ΔF(1,113) = 0.63, p = .430."
Silver 2022 (2)¶
Silver, A. M., Elliott, L., & Libertus, M. E. (2022). Parental math input is not uniformly beneficial for young children: The moderating role of inhibitory control. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000679
q2 · i? · associational · r2
In the covariate-adjusted base model, the main effect of parent-reported home math activity frequency (LeFevre questionnaire) was null, though the bivariate correlation was marginally significant (r = .17); the authors attribute this partly to self-report measurement limits.
"However, home math activities were not significantly related to children's math achievement."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Executive Function — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Children's inhibitory control moderates the association between parental number talk and children's math achievement, with a positive association only at higher inhibitory control — related
- The number talk × inhibitory control interaction is domain-specific: it did not hold for parents' overall talk or for children's vocabulary as the outcome — related
- More frequent parent-reported home literacy activities were associated with better children's math performance, controlling for covariates — related
- At high (but not low) levels of children's inhibitory control, parental number talk was associated with children's math performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
home-math-activities-null-moderation |
title |
Parent-reported home math activities showed no significant association with children's math achievement, and inhibitory control did not moderate this null relation |
description |
Parent-reported home math activities showed no significant association with children's math achievement, and inhibitory control did not moderate this null relation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — silver-2022, silver-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.