Children's inhibitory control moderates the association between parental number talk and children's math achievement, with a positive association only at higher inhibitory control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The interaction between parental number talk and children's inhibitory control predicting children's math achievement was statistically significant, explaining an additional 3.2% of variance. → Silver 2022
Evidence¶
Silver 2022¶
Silver, A. M., Elliott, L., & Libertus, M. E. (2022). Parental math input is not uniformly beneficial for young children: The moderating role of inhibitory control. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000679
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Hierarchical regression in a sample of 123 children (Mage = 3.9 years) showed a significant number talk × inhibitory control interaction, "Cohen's f2 = .04", adding 3.2% of variance and ΔF(1,113) = 4.26, p = .041. The effect size printed is Cohen's f², so no standardized d-type impact value is coded.
"This interaction was significant with a small to medium effect size with Cohen's f2 = .04, and resulted in an additional 3.2% of variance explained in children's math achievement, a significant increase from the first model, ΔF(1,113) = 4.26, p = .041."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Executive Function — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Parent-reported home math activities showed no significant association with children's math achievement, and inhibitory control did not moderate this null relation — related
- Children's inhibitory control is positively related to math achievement as a main effect, independent of parental input — related
- The number talk × inhibitory control interaction is domain-specific: it did not hold for parents' overall talk or for children's vocabulary as the outcome — related
- At high (but not low) levels of children's inhibitory control, parental number talk was associated with children's math performance — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Student characteristics beyond prior knowledge bear on inquiry learning: inhibitory control predicts inquiry outcomes, and in one study a direct-instruction advantage over inquiry held only for students with low domain self-concept — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
number-talk-inhibitory-control-interaction-math |
title |
Children's inhibitory control moderates the association between parental number talk and children's math achievement, with a positive association only at higher inhibitory control |
description |
Children's inhibitory control moderates the association between parental number talk and children's math achievement, with a positive association only at higher inhibitory control |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — silver-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.