Claims

Homework solutions showed experimental students using multiple strategies correctly while control students made additive errors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Experimental group students used different strategies (cross-multiplication, creating equivalent fractions, unit fractions) with correct expressions, while control group students did not notice multiplicative relations and made incorrect additive solutions. → Şen 2017

Evidence

Şen 2017

Şen, C., & Güler, G. (2017). Effect of Strategy Teaching For the Solution of Ratio Problems on Students' Proportional Reasoning Skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1142503

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative analysis of homework problem-form solutions (Figures 1 and 2), presented as citations without scoring. The article reports that experimental students' solutions "support the scores they got from the PRT" and that control students' multiplicative relations were not noticed.

"It was observed that control group students made additive operations and that their solutions were incorrect since they could not notice ratio and proportional relations."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.