Claims

Pupils who attended the Saturday school showed positive engagement, improved behaviour, confidence, and social skills per the process evaluation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The process evaluation revealed a positive picture of involvement and engagement for pupils who attended, with stakeholders reporting improvements in behaviour, confidence, and social skills. → Menzies et al. 2016

Evidence

Menzies et al. 2016

Victoria Menzies, Adetayo Kasim, Dimitra Kokotsaki, Catherine Hewitt, Nasima Akhter, Clare Collyer, Kirsty Younger, Andy Wiggins and Carole Torgerson. (2016). Hallé SHINE on Manchester: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581134

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative process evaluation (observations and stakeholder reports) of attended Saturday sessions; findings are perceptual reports rather than measured attainment gains. The report adds that more challenging feedback may have helped pupils' learning.

"Evaluators observed good working relationships between the teachers and pupils , and positive and purposeful learning environments in lessons. All stakeholders felt pupils were making noticeable improvements in behaviour, confidence, and development of social skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.