Claims

The Hallé SHINE on Manchester Saturday school programme showed no evidence of impact on reading attainment across all three trial years

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q4 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i0 There is no evidence that the programme had an impact on the reading attainment of children in the trial, consistent across all age groups, FSM-eligible pupils, and all three years. → Menzies et al. 2016

Evidence

Menzies et al. 2016

Victoria Menzies, Adetayo Kasim, Dimitra Kokotsaki, Catherine Hewitt, Nasima Akhter, Clare Collyer, Kirsty Younger, Andy Wiggins and Carole Torgerson. (2016). Hallé SHINE on Manchester: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581134

q4 · i0 · causal · r2

Three two-armed cluster RCTs (pilot 361 pupils in 18 schools; main trial 2,306 pupils in 38 schools) with random allocation at year-group level, analysed by multi-level modelling on intention-to-treat. Year 1 effect size was "0.03 (-0.27, 0.34)"; Year 2 -0.10; Year 3 0.10, all with confidence intervals spanning zero.

"There is no evidence that the Hallé Shine on Manchester programme had an impact on the reading attainment of children in the trial. This finding was consistent across all age groups, for pupils eligible for free school meals, and for all three years of the trials."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.