The study explores hypotheses about factors that predict the magnitude of cross-site impact variation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The authors use their variation estimates to explore hypotheses about factors predicting the magnitude of cross-site impact variation. → Michael J. Weiss 2017
Evidence¶
Michael J. Weiss 2017¶
Michael J. Weiss, Howard S. Bloom, Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz, Himani Gupta, Alma E. Vigil, Daniel N. Cullinan. (2017). How Much Do the Effects of Education and Training Programs Vary Across Sites? Evidence from Past Multisite Randomized Trials. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, vol. 10, issue 4. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/how-much-do-the-effects-of-education-and-training-programs-vary-across-sites-evidence doi:10.1080/19345747.2017.1300719
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Per the abstract, the estimated cross-site standard deviations are used to "explore hypotheses about factors that predict the magnitude of cross-site impact variation". The available text does not print which factors or what the hypothesis tests found.
"We use these findings to explore hypotheses about factors that predict the magnitude of cross-site impact variation"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cross-site standard deviations of ITT effects were estimated for education and workforce interventions using data from 16 large multisite randomized controlled trials — related
- Cross-site impact variation has implications for the statistical precision of multisite trials — related
- Methods for estimating impacts when treatment effects vary apply to randomized controlled trials and are also applicable to quasi-experimental designs — related
- Factors highlighted in the co-teaching literature as preconditions for effectiveness did not explain variation in effect sizes — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The trial examines variation in curriculum impact by pre- and post-migration conflict experiences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hypotheses-predicting-cross-site-impact-variation |
title |
The study explores hypotheses about factors that predict the magnitude of cross-site impact variation |
description |
The study explores hypotheses about factors that predict the magnitude of cross-site impact variation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — michael-j-weiss-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.