The authors hypothesize, but do not yet test, that student-centered guest lecturing promotes more engagement than traditional guest lecturing and that perceived engagement translates into active engagement behavior¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? RQ1 proposes that in online environments student-centered guest lecturing promotes more student engagement than traditional guest lecturing; RQ2 proposes that students with higher perceived engagement will show more active engagement behavior. → Lei Li; Rong Guo 2015

Evidence¶

Lei Li; Rong Guo 2015¶

Lei Li; Rong Guo. (2015). A student-centered guest lecturing: A constructivism approach to promote student engagement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 15. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html

q1 · i? · design · r2

This is the article's stated research framework, not a tested result. The authors distinguish perceived engagement (questionnaire) from actual engagement (course management system activity such as login frequency and video-watching time) and hypothesize that perception turns into behavior. No comparison data are reported in the article.

"RQ1. In an online learning environment, student-centered guest lecturing activity can promote more student engagement than traditional guest lecturing can."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a pilot study of student-centered guest lecturing, most online graduate students reported positive satisfaction and perceived engagement with the approach — related
• Predominantly lecture-based courses are associated with less engagement, while class discussion and group work time are associated with more — related