Claims

In a pilot study of student-centered guest lecturing, most online graduate students reported positive satisfaction and perceived engagement with the approach

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Over 80% of pilot participants enjoyed and reported learning from the recorded guest-speaker interviews, and over 70% reported the approach made them interested in, helped them understand, and engaged them in the course. → Lei Li; Rong Guo 2015

Evidence

Lei Li; Rong Guo 2015

Lei Li; Rong Guo. (2015). A student-centered guest lecturing: A constructivism approach to promote student engagement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 15. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html

q2 · i? · design · r2

Pilot implementation of study period 1 in an online graduate-level course: a web-based survey administered to 27 invited subjects, 19 completed. Positive perceptions on a 5-point scale included "I enjoyed watching the recorded interviews 84.21%" and engagement items at 73.68%–78.94%. No effect size or inferential test is reported; findings are descriptive percentages only.

"Over 80% of them enjoyed the recorded interview sessions with guest speakers and learned a lot from them. More than 70% of the participants think student-centered approach is very useful: it made them interested in the course; helped them understand course material, made them engaged in the course."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.