Using the ICLS improved students' knowledge of modular programming but produced no significant change in self-esteem or interest in the subject¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students' academic achievement of modular programming concepts improved after using the ICLS. → McManus 2015
q2 i? Students showed no significant change in self-esteem and interest in the subject after using the ICLS. → McManus 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
McManus 2015¶
McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (2015). Supporting Effective Collaboration: Using a Rearview Mirror to Look Forward. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0068-6
q2 · i? · causal · r1
From the two experiments with undergraduate students (18 in the first, nine in the second, in the first computer science course at a local institution). The article reports that 'academic achievement improved their knowledge of modular programming' after ICLS use; no effect size is printed.
"The students' academic achievement improved their knowledge of modular programming."
McManus 2015 (2)¶
McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (2015). Supporting Effective Collaboration: Using a Rearview Mirror to Look Forward. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0068-6
q2 · i? · design · r2
Null attitudinal result from the same two small experiments with undergraduates. The article reports 'did not have a significant change in their self-esteem and interest in the subject' and attributes this possibly to the small sample size; no effect size is printed.
"However, results showed that the students did not have a significant change in their self-esteem and interest in the subject, but this may have been due to the small sample size."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The BFLPE is domain-specific: school-average achievement affects academic self-concept but not global self-esteem or non-academic self-concept — related
- Mastery learning has overall positive effects on student affect, with the exception of slightly lower grade expectations — related
- Students in the ICLS experiments were satisfied with the system and mostly found it useful for collaborating, but were concerned about its slowness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
icls-achievement-gain-self-esteem-null |
title |
Using the ICLS improved students' knowledge of modular programming but produced no significant change in self-esteem or interest in the subject |
description |
Using the ICLS improved students' knowledge of modular programming but produced no significant change in self-esteem or interest in the subject |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mcmanus-2015, mcmanus-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.