Students in the ICLS experiments were satisfied with the system and mostly found it useful for collaborating, but were concerned about its slowness¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students were satisfied with the ICLS and most thought it useful for working collaboratively. → McManus 2015

Evidence¶

McManus 2015¶

McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (2015). Supporting Effective Collaboration: Using a Rearview Mirror to Look Forward. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0068-6

q2 · i? · design · r2

Results reporting from two experiments in which undergraduate computer science students used the ICLS for Jigsaw-style group programming tasks. The experiments found that 'the students were satisfied with the system and most thought that it was useful for working collaboratively.'

"The results of the experiments indicated that the students were satisfied with the system and most thought that it was useful for working collaboratively."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using the ICLS improved students' knowledge of modular programming but produced no significant change in self-esteem or interest in the subject — related
• Open inquiry positively influences students' attitudes towards science, including satisfaction, collaboration and self-confidence — related