Claims

In-classroom physical activity breaks show no significant effect on children's test anxiety

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The pooled effect on test anxiety was not statistically significant (SMD = 0.16, p = 0.50). → Peiris D. L. I. H. K. 2022

Evidence

Peiris D. L. I. H. K. 2022

Peiris D. L. I. H. K., Duan Yanping, Vandelanotte Corneel, Liang Wei, Yang Min, Baker Julien Steven. (2022). Effects of In-Classroom Physical Activity Breaks on Children’s Academic Performance, Cognition, Health Behaviours and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159479

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of two intervention samples (n = 68 students) from a single one-day RCT (Mavilidi et al.) measuring test anxiety. The pooled SMD = 0.16 was not significant (p = 0.50) with I2 = 0%; the article labels it "moderate to large" despite the trivial magnitude.

"Two intervention samples (n = 68 students) from a single study [60], which was meta analyzed for test-anxiety as a mental health outcome provided a moderate to large pooled effect size (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI [−0.31 to 0.64], p = 0.50; I2 = 0%, p = 0.71) favoring the IcPAB intervention"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.