Claims

The ICT-taught experimental group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's mean EMSAT score rose from 25.80 (SD=4.30) to 35.30 (SD=2.41), a significant paired difference (t = -29.030, p = 0.000). → Oluwadare 2015

Evidence

Oluwadare 2015

Oluwadare, F. A. (2015). ICT Use in Preschool Science Education: A Case Study of Some Private Nursery Schools in Ekiti State. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083397

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired samples t-test comparing pre- and post-test EMSAT scores within the experimental (ICT) group of 132 children. Table 2 prints t = -29.030, df = 131, mean difference -9.530, significance 0.000; no effect size is printed.

"The mean grade for the pre-test of the study was 25.80 (SD= 4.30) compared to 35.30 (SD= 2.41) of the post-test. At α = .05 and df = 131, the critical value of the t ratio was less than 0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.