Claims

Preschool pupils taught science and mathematics with ICT scored significantly higher than traditionally taught pupils at post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After a four-week intervention, the experimental (ICT) group's EMSAT scores were significantly higher than the control group's (t = -2.007, p = 0.046). → Oluwadare 2015

Evidence

Oluwadare 2015

Oluwadare, F. A. (2015). ICT Use in Preschool Science Education: A Case Study of Some Private Nursery Schools in Ekiti State. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083397

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on post-test EMSAT scores of the experimental group (132 children) and control group (128 children) after the four-week teaching intervention. The article reports "t = -2.007, p = 0.046" as significant between the groups; no effect size is printed.

"Finally, an independent sample t-test was conducted . The t-test for equality of means was significant (t = -2.007, p = 0.046), indicating significant differences, in the scores between the experimental and control groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.