Claims

ICT-supported short narratives produced higher post-test achievement than regular curriculum instruction in 6th-grade Force and Motion

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After six weeks, the experimental group taught with ICT-supported short stories scored significantly higher on the force and motion achievement test than the control group taught with the regular course. → Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015

Evidence

Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015

Fatma Taşkin Ekici, Sultan Pekmezci. (2015). Using ICT-Supported Narratives in Teaching Science and their Effects on Middle School Students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077655

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study with intact classes of 6th graders (control n=21, experimental n=23). Independent-samples t-test on post-test achievement: the article reports "t(43)=1,29 p<.05"; Table 2 prints post-test means of 8.33 (control) and 10.26 (experimental), p=0.04, Cohen's d=-0.64.

"there is a statistically significant difference between the post-treatment test scores of the control and experimental group students [t(43)=1,29 p<.05]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.