Claims

Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students instructed in a technological (e-) classroom achieved significantly higher post-test mean scores than students taught in the conventional classroom. → Oso Senny Oluwatumbi 2015

Evidence

Oso Senny Oluwatumbi 2015

Oso Senny Oluwatumbi. (2015). E-Classroom of the 21st Century: Information Gaps. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079755

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test, post-test control group study of 80 purposively sampled secondary students in Ekiti State, taught for 8 weeks. The experimental group's post-test mean was 32.07 (SD 1.95) versus the control group's 25.87 (SD 6.34); the article reports "t-cal (5.91) is greater than t-table (1.66)" at 0.05 significance. No effect size is printed.

"The table above shows that t-cal (5.91) is greater than t-table (1.66) implying that the hypothesis is rejected hence there is a significant difference between the performance of those instructed with technology and those taught in the conventional classroom"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.