Experimental-group achievement rose significantly from pre- to post-test while the control group's gain was not significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's achievement scores increased significantly from pre-test to post-test (t=7.80, p<.05). → Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015
q2 i? The control group showed no statistically significant pre-to-post achievement difference (t=0.984, p>.05), though its mean rose descriptively. → Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015¶
Fatma Taşkin Ekici, Sultan Pekmezci. (2015). Using ICT-Supported Narratives in Teaching Science and their Effects on Middle School Students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077655
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Paired-samples t-test within the experimental group (n=23): means rose from 6.70 to 10.26; Table 3 prints t=7.80, p=0.000, Cohen's d=-1.26. The article attributes the gain to story-assisted courses.
"there is a significant difference observed between the pre-test and post-test scores of the students in terms of achievement (t=7,80;p<.05)"
Fatma Taşkin Ekici 2015 (2)¶
Fatma Taşkin Ekici, Sultan Pekmezci. (2015). Using ICT-Supported Narratives in Teaching Science and their Effects on Middle School Students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077655
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired-samples t-test within the control group (n=21) receiving regular curriculum: means rose from 7.48 to 8.33 but the article reports t=0,984; p>.05 (Table 3 prints p=0.337), an increase the authors call typical course achievement.
"there is no significant achievement difference statistically between the pre-test and post-test scores of the control group students, who had regular Ministry of Education curriculum without stories"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Control-group students also improved significantly from pre-test to post-test under the 2018 Turkish Course Curriculum, gaining about 9 points — reports the opposite
- Within the experimental group, achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's gain was not statistically significant — related
- Experimental (ABSI) group's achievement scores increased significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's did not — related
- No significant difference in achievement between ABSI and control groups on pre-test or post-test scores — related
- Middle-school students who read a mostly science-fiction book set alongside the science curriculum gained significantly in science curiosity, in a study whose groups already differed at pre-test — related
- Paired-samples t-tests show a significant mean-score gain from pre- to post-test in the VHPI group but not in the conventional-instruction group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.