Claims

No significant difference in achievement between ABSI and control groups on pre-test or post-test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Independent samples t-tests found no significant difference between experimental and control groups on pre-test (t(82)=0.894, p>0.05) or post-test (t(82)=0.149, p>0.05) achievement scores. → Eda Pınar Tüccaroğlu 2018

Evidence

Eda Pınar Tüccaroğlu 2018

Eda Pınar Tüccaroğlu, Yeter Şimşekli. (2018). Effects of Argument-based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Approach Used in the Unit of "Reproduction Growth Development in Living Beings" on the Success Levels of Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(10): 2379-2383. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061037

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test on post-test scores of 55 experimental and 29 control students from a 20-question achievement test; means were 45.07 vs 44.55 and "t(82)=0.149, p>0.05", so no significant between-group difference was found.

"it was found that the mean of the scores obtained by the students in the experimental group was (X) 45.07, that of the scores obtained by the control group was (X) 44.55 t(82)=0.149, p>0.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.