ICT-supported teaching improved pupils' attitudes toward ICT but not their attitudes toward social studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's ICT attitudes post-test scores were significantly higher than the control group's, in favor of the experimental group (t = 1.996, p = .050). → Emin Cener 2015
q2 i? The treatment did not improve the experimental group's attitudes toward social studies; post-test scores of both groups were lower than their pre-test scores and remained significantly in favor of the control group. → Emin Cener 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Emin Cener 2015¶
Emin Cener, Ismail Acun & Gokhan Demirhan. (2015). The Impact of ICT on Pupils' Achievement and Attitudes in Social Studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105333
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Independent-samples t-test on the ICT attitude scale (Cronbach's alpha .97) with 35 pupils per group. Pre-test scores showed no significant difference (t = .772, p = .443); post-test favored the experimental group (t = 1.996, p = .050).
"However, there is a significant difference between experimental and control groups' ICT attitudes post -test scores in favor of experimental group. It seems that the treatment had a positive effect on pupils' attitudes towards ICT."
Emin Cener 2015 (2)¶
Emin Cener, Ismail Acun & Gokhan Demirhan. (2015). The Impact of ICT on Pupils' Achievement and Attitudes in Social Studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105333
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Independent-samples t-tests on the social studies attitude scale (Cronbach's alpha .89). The control group held significantly more favorable attitudes at both pre-test (t = -2.347, p = .022) and post-test (t = -2.311, p = .024), and both groups' scores declined from pre- to post-test.
"Post-test scores of both groups were lower than their pre -test scores on social studies attitudes scale. This means the treatment did not improve experimental group's attitudes towards social studies education."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- ICT-supported social studies teaching produced higher achievement post-test scores than traditional instruction in a quasi-experiment with 6th graders — related
- Prior knowledge and ICT-supported instruction predicted achievement post-test scores, while pupils' attitudes toward the subject and ICT did not — related
- Pupils' pre-test attitudes toward social studies were negatively correlated with their pre-treatment attitudes toward ICT — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.