Claims

ICT-supported teaching improved pupils' attitudes toward ICT but not their attitudes toward social studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's ICT attitudes post-test scores were significantly higher than the control group's, in favor of the experimental group (t = 1.996, p = .050). → Emin Cener 2015 q2 i? The treatment did not improve the experimental group's attitudes toward social studies; post-test scores of both groups were lower than their pre-test scores and remained significantly in favor of the control group. → Emin Cener 2015 (2)

Evidence

Emin Cener 2015

Emin Cener, Ismail Acun & Gokhan Demirhan. (2015). The Impact of ICT on Pupils' Achievement and Attitudes in Social Studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105333

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test on the ICT attitude scale (Cronbach's alpha .97) with 35 pupils per group. Pre-test scores showed no significant difference (t = .772, p = .443); post-test favored the experimental group (t = 1.996, p = .050).

"However, there is a significant difference between experimental and control groups' ICT attitudes post -test scores in favor of experimental group. It seems that the treatment had a positive effect on pupils' attitudes towards ICT."

Emin Cener 2015 (2)

Emin Cener, Ismail Acun & Gokhan Demirhan. (2015). The Impact of ICT on Pupils' Achievement and Attitudes in Social Studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105333

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-tests on the social studies attitude scale (Cronbach's alpha .89). The control group held significantly more favorable attitudes at both pre-test (t = -2.347, p = .022) and post-test (t = -2.311, p = .024), and both groups' scores declined from pre- to post-test.

"Post-test scores of both groups were lower than their pre -test scores on social studies attitudes scale. This means the treatment did not improve experimental group's attitudes towards social studies education."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.