Claims

Prior knowledge and ICT-supported instruction predicted achievement post-test scores, while pupils' attitudes toward the subject and ICT did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ICT attitude and social studies attitude scores, at pre-test and post-test, did not significantly predict achievement post-test scores. → Emin Cener 2015

Evidence

Emin Cener 2015

Emin Cener, Ismail Acun & Gokhan Demirhan. (2015). The Impact of ICT on Pupils' Achievement and Attitudes in Social Studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105333

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the same regression, ICT attitude pre-test (beta = -.106, p = .329), social studies attitude pre-test (beta = .229, p = .049), ICT attitude post-test (beta = .033, p = .768) and social studies attitude post-test (beta = -.077, p = .496) were reported as not affecting achievement; the second block did not contribute (R² change = .028, p = .310).

"Regression analysis shows that pupils' academic achievement levels were not affected by their attitudes towards ICT and social studies."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.