Most field-test students elected introductory tutorial information, supporting the tutorial requirement for usability¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Almost all students elected to receive basic (51%) or detailed (40%) information about the IDSA prototype, and understandability of the text and content was rated M = 3.52 (SD 1.68). → Karrenbauer 2023

Evidence¶

Karrenbauer 2023¶

Karrenbauer, C., Brauner, T., König, C. M., & Breitner, M. H. (2023). Design, development, and evaluation of an individual digital study assistant for higher education students. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10255-8

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire item from the 3-month field evaluation of the prototype. Uptake of the optional tutorial content (51% basic, 40% detailed) was read by the authors as aligning with requirement R.7.4 that optional introduction tutorials improve students' understanding of the IDSA, its functionalities, purpose, and use.

"The results align with the requirement of an instructional tutorial (R.7.4) to increase usability. Almost all students elected to receive basic (51%) or detailed information (40%) about the IDSA prototype, its functionalities, and its usage."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Field-tested IDSA prototype received moderate usability ratings: usage enjoyment highest, design and realization lowest — related
• Integrating the IDSA into an existing learning management system limited usability, as the platform predefined frontend structure and navigation — related
• Stakeholder and literature analysis yields seven IDSA requirement groups covering functionalities, contact options, data-based individuality, testing, marketing, data protection, and usability — a broader claim this one bears on