Stakeholder and literature analysis yields seven IDSA requirement groups covering functionalities, contact options, data-based individuality, testing, marketing, data protection, and usability¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Qualitative and quantitative analyses plus a literature review merge into seven requirements with multiple sub-items for IDSA design and development. → Karrenbauer 2023
Evidence¶
Karrenbauer 2023¶
Karrenbauer, C., Brauner, T., König, C. M., & Breitner, M. H. (2023). Design, development, and evaluation of an individual digital study assistant for higher education students. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10255-8
q2 · i? · design · r2
Requirements derivation combining an online survey (n = 570 students from three German higher education institutions), expert interviews with nine lecturers and 19 organization-unit employees, and a guided literature review. Findings were "merged into seven requirements with various IDSA design and development sub-items" covering functionalities (R.1) through usability (R.7).
"All results and findings were merged into seven requirements with various IDSA design and development sub-items based on the quantitative student survey and qualitative expert interviews."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Integrating the IDSA into an existing learning management system limited usability, as the platform predefined frontend structure and navigation — related
- Most field-test students elected introductory tutorial information, supporting the tutorial requirement for usability — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Field-tested IDSA prototype received moderate usability ratings: usage enjoyment highest, design and realization lowest — related
- In a three-month field test, exploration and learning-organization functionalities were the most used, while social and data-ethics functionalities were used least — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
seven-idsa-requirement-groups-stakeholder-analysis |
title |
Stakeholder and literature analysis yields seven IDSA requirement groups covering functionalities, contact options, data-based individuality, testing, marketing, data protection, and usability |
description |
Stakeholder and literature analysis yields seven IDSA requirement groups covering functionalities, contact options, data-based individuality, testing, marketing, data protection, and usability |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — karrenbauer-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.